Skip past navigation to main part of page
 
Melbourne Institute Homepage
---

Attrition Bias

Attrition is generally only a serious concern when it is non-random (that is, when the persons that attrit from the panel have characteristics that are systematically different from those who remain).

Table 61 provides figures on the proportion of Wave 1 respondents who were re-interviewed in Wave 6 disaggregated by various sample characteristics. For those persons interested in the balanced panel, the proportion of Wave 1 respondents who have been interviewed in every wave is also provided. People who have died or moved overseas are excluded from these figures. These results indicate that the re-interview rate is lowest among people with following Wave 1 characteristics:

  • living in Sydney and Melbourne;
  • aged 15 to 24 years;
  • single or living in a de facto marriage;
  • born in a non–English–speaking country;
  • Aboriginal Torres Strait Islander;
  • living in a flat, unit or apartment;
  • relatively low levels of education;
  • unemployed; or
  • working in blue–collar or low–skilled occupations

The variance in attrition over the five waves is particularly marked with respect to age, country of birth, labour force and occupation.

The disparity in the re–interview rates for wave 1 respondents re–interviewed in wave 6 across the different characteristics is not as great as for those interviewed every wave. The most striking example of this is indigenous status – while only 51.8 per cent of indigenous respondents in wave 1 have been re–interviewed every wave, 70.8 per cent were re–interviewed in wave 6. This indicates that the groups with low re–interview rates in the balanced panel are still engaged with the study.

Overall, attrition is not random. While we can make adjustments for the attrition through the sample weights, these adjustments are only as good as our ability to measure differential attrition.

The attrition rates are discussed at length in Watson and Wooden (2004c) and Watson and Wooden (2006).

Table 61: Percentage of Wave 1 Respondents Re–interviewed by Selected Sample Characteristics
Wave 1 characteristics In all waves (%) In wave 6 (%) Wave 1 characteristics In all waves (%) In wave 6 (%)
Area Indigenous status
Sydney 62.9 73.4 Indigenous 51.8 70.8
Rest of NSW 70.7 78.8 Non–indigenous 67.9 76.3
Melbourne 65.7 75.8 Education attainment
Rest of Victoria 64.9 73.2 Year 11 or below 64.1 73.1
Brisbane 72.1 78.8 Year 12 63.7 74.4
Rest of Qld 69.4 77.2 Certificate 67.3 75.4
Adelaide 71.3 77.8 Diploma 72.8 80.7
Rest of SA 66.2 76.8 Degree or higher 77.3 83.9
Perth 68.2 74.4 Dwelling type
Rest of WA 65.7 75.7 House 68.0 76.6
Tasmania 71.3 79.4 Semi–detached 69.0 77.0
Northern Territory 81.5 89.4 Flat, unit, apartment 63.7 72.7
ACT 69.3 76.2 Other 61.7 70.0
Sex Labour force status
Male 66.0 74.7 Employed full–time 66.8 75.7
Female 69.1 77.6 Employed part–time 69.8 78.9
Age group (years) Unemployed 55.8 68.4
15–19 54.2 68.6 Not in labour force 69.0 76.3
20–24 54.9 68.8 Employment status in main job*
25–34 65.2 75.6 Employee 67.8 76.7
35–44 69.8 77.4 Employer 66.8 75.4
45–54 69.9 77.0 Own account worker 69.9 77.7
55–64 74.3 80.6 Contributing family worker 68.2 83.6
65–74 78.8 84.0 Occupation*
75+ 65.4 71.5 Managers / administrators 70.4 79.8
Marital status Professionals 76.2 84.1
Married 70.6 78.0 Associate professionals 67.0 76.0
De facto 63.9 75.0 Tradespersons 62.6 72.1
Separated 67.5 75.4 Advanced clerical / service 66.3 76.1
Divorced 74.8 83.0 Intermediate clerical / sales / service 68.1 76.5
Widowed 75.8 79.4 Intermediate production / transport 61.5 69.0
Single 58.8 70.6 Elementary clerical / sales / service 65.0 76.2
Country of birth Labourers 60.8 71.5
Australia 69.6 78.0 Total 67.6 76.2
Overseas Number responding 8864 10085
Main English–speaking 69.3 76.5  
Other 56.0 66.5  
* Employed sub–sample only.

 

top of pagetop of page

HILDA Contact us

Contact the University : Disclaimer & Copyright : Privacy : Accessibility